We delve into the news of a possible exchange between Vlahovic and Zirkzee: some concerns and an idea we have already proposed
You know those news stories you read twice to make sure you get it right? This is one of them. Dusan Vlahovic to United and Joshua Zirkzee to Juventus: that’s the sensational scenario painted by Talk Sport’s English colleagues.
Scambio fra Zirkzee Vlahovic, cosa c’è di vero? (Foto: Ansa) – serieanews.com
Apparently, the Bianconeri have reportedly offered the Serbian striker to the Red Devils in exchange for the young Dutchman’s card, valued by Thiago Motta since his time at Bologna. But, if we think about it, this alleged deal leaves more questions than answers.
Juventus is aware of its gaps in attack, but it is clear that the department needs to be supplemented, not revolutionized. Vlahovic, despite criticism, represents a mainstay. Adding Zirkzee to give Thiago Motta more options would be a smart move, especially thinking about an increasingly busy schedule and the need to alternate offensive performers.
On the other hand, the scenario put forward by Talk Sport seems far too sensational to be realistic. Maybe it is just an inflated hypothesis to fill the pages of winter soccer market. Or maybe there is more to it, but in completely different terms than those told.
In a market like the current one, where surprises are the order of the day, you can never say never. But one thing is certain: Juventus cannot afford rash moves. Rather, it must think carefully about how to reinforce a roster that, net of difficulties, has shown signs of growth. Perhaps Zirkzee is indeed in the crosshairs, but as Vlahovic’s partner, not as a replacement. But let’s go into detail.
Vlahovic e Zirkzee: meglio uno scambio o meglio vederli insieme?
Let’s start with Vlahovic. Despite the accompanying criticism, the numbers speak for themselves: 12 goals and 2 assists this season. We are not talking about a striker in a black crisis, but one who is still one of the spearheads of Serie A. Juventus needs to reinforce the attack, sure, but giving up a starter like him seems like a risky move, especially without a replacement of equal caliber already in the house.
Moreover, Vlahovic’s contract expires in 2026 and his market value is still very high, estimated at least twice that of Zirkzee. By selling the Serbian, Juventus would risk losing a technical and economic asset, unless a significant adjustment is made.
Zirkzee e Vlahovic: avversari o compagni di squadra (Foto: Ansa) – serieanews.com
Let’s turn to Joshua Zirkzee. Talent? Sure, there is. Promise? Also. But is it enough to envision a starring role at Juventus? The Dutchman cost Manchester United 40 million, but it is safe to assume that he is worth less today. He could even be sold on loan. It is no secret that Thiago Motta values him for his technical and tactical characteristics, but it is difficult to see him as an immediate solution to replace Vlahovic.
Indeed, it is much more realistic to imagine Zirkzee as a tactical alternative: someone capable of flanking Vlahovic or offering a variation in the offensive phase, rather than replacing him altogether. Thinking about a Vlahovic-Zirkzee tandem, as we have already explained to you, would not be a bad idea at all, especially in a system that seeks to enhance different game options.
Another knot is the economic value of the transaction. If Zirkzee is worth less than Vlahovic, how can one think of an equal exchange? Something has to balance the difference, and this “something” could be a major economic adjustment from United. Without it, the deal seems anything but advantageous for Juventus.
More likely is that the Bianconeri are considering Zirkzee for a separate transaction, perhaps a cut-price purchase or a loan with a right of redemption. This strategy would make much more sense: bringing in a young striker with room for growth without depriving themselves of a starter like Vlahovic.
This article Vlahovic-Zirkzee swap: breaking news, but something doesn’t add up appeared in its original version first on SerieANews.
