Insufficiency for Napoli-Milan match director, analysis leaves no doubt. details.
The day after Napoli’s victory over AC Milan, we draw conclusions and analyze the episodes that occurred during the match. An important triumph for the Azzurri, who take advantage of Atalanta’s defeat to continue, on a solitary basis, the chase on the leading Inter Milan.
Antonio Conte’s men were the protagonists of an impeccable first half, and a management resumption in which, however, Milan also came close to equalizing. The opposite discourse, of course, for the Rossoneri, who in the first half suffered Napoli’s superiority, and in the second grew, finding the goal that shortened the distance and almost equalizing a couple of times.
Napoli-Milan, Sozza bocciato: l’analisi
Key episode, of course, the penalty awarded to Milan in the 69′ minute, then missed by Gimenez. Today’s edition of Il Corriere dello Sport analyzes the referee’s decision and, in general, Sozza.’s performance, rated 5.5.
Napoli-Milan, Sozza bocciato: l’analisi (Ansa) spazionapoli.it
“Good but not great Sozza, some choices were frankly not very linear and clear. Penalty always whistled on the field, final to be handled better, he was at the mercy of the game, leaving clear fouls on the field – writes the newspaper – There is a penalty to Milan, from the field it is always whistled: very naive Billing but also very clever Theo Hernandez. The Frenchman burns the opponent on time and gets in front of him (taking the advantage of the eventual penalty) and in doing so puts his left leg between those of the Dane (100% foul guarantee). Impossible for Sozza to do otherwise, impossible for VAR to intervene,” Corriere dello Sport concludes.
