AS ROMA NEWS – Newspapers are sharply divided on the assessment of referee Clement Turpin, the French match director who last night affected the 3-1 final of Athletic Club-Roma with a red to Hummels awarded early in the game. For Corriere dello Sport, the whistle blower’s direction is grossly inadequate, while for Gazzetta dello Sport it is extremely positive, so much so that it deserves a seven. Sufficient for Tuttosport and Corriere della Sera, from 5 for Il Tempo.
IL CORRIERE DELLO SPORT Rating 4. The man in three-quarter, namely Clement Turpin and his (long) sleeves always worn at mid-arm, summer and winter, heavily conditions the San Mamés match. The red to Hummels is a matter for discussion, to say that it is also a fairly clear error, which VAR can hardly get a hand on. How can it be a clear goal opportunity 40 meters from the goal.
LA GAZZETTA DELLO SPORT Rating 7. Fair decision, the referee judges Hummels as a last man and in fact Sannadi is thrown into the open field and has all the space to go towards the Giallorossi goal
TUTTOSPORT Rating 6: The red to Hummels is correct as is the penalty awarded for the foul on El Shaarawy
IL CORRIERE DELLA SERA Rating 6: The red to Hummels is severe but fair. He lets Dybala abuse him too much.
THE TIME Rating 5: Red is rushed given the area of the field and Mancini’s chance to recover. Right penalty.
The article Athletic Club-Roma, the moviola: Newspapers split on Turpin’s refereeing direction comes from Giallorossi.net, exclusive news, news and soccer market news.
